Pitch

Let us start with defining what we mean by pitch.
This is the frequency we call a/1. The other notes then follow from the temperament chosen. 

So for instance, a/1 at present officially is fixed at 440 Hz as a standard. This does not mean that orchestras indeed play at exactly 440 Hz. On the contrary, they all play a bit higher. I am no expert on this subject at all but it seems that this even differs a fraction per orchestra. What are we talking about? They play at 442 Hz or so.

In the eighteenth century there was no rigorous standard. To say that there was no standard at all would be wrong as well because nobody would play a/1 at 350 Hz or at 495 Hz on a traverso. So there was a range a/1 might be anywhere between 385 Hz and 485 Hz.
Because in orchestras different instruments play together they had to adapt much more then for instance at present, where a flute is pulled a little bit or a violin is tuned.

Traverso's are therefore found with widely varying pitches and different means to adapt to a certain extent to the optimal pitch they were aimed at. In Tromlitz [2] a nice description of the different middle pieces, cork screw and foot register can be found.

Basically the flute is lengthened or shortened by using different length left hand pieces. These have a different bore and finger hole arrangement. However, it is a bit comparable with changing a dress made for some body else by only cutting of from the bottom. The waist will be at the wrong place that way, and an optimal result means changing the whole dress. Changing the whole dress here simply would mean another flute. Some in between possibilities were used.
The cork was moved of course. The longer the middle piece the further the cork should go in. Also the foot joint was lengthened. For this purpose a small inset piece register was added to the foot joint, to be pulled out or pushed in as required by the chosen middle piece.

The revival of playing eighteenth century music on original instruments or copies of such instruments therefore posed a problem. On the one hand it was discovered that the early eighteenth century music played so much nicer on lower instruments, as they had used at the time. On the other hand it was found impossible to go back to the situation where there were many different pitches.
At that time the practice of playing on new recorders at 440 Hz as well as on lower pitched instruments gave the idea to choose a new low pitch standard at 415 Hz. This is a half tone below the 440 Hz standard. The advantage was thought to be the fact that a harpsichord could be quickly changed from the high to the low pitch by shifting the keyboard over half a tone and than retuning a bit. At present we have a third standard, which is 392 Hz, so a whole tone under 440 Hz.
There are early French instruments at this pitch. We also know that Frederick the Great liked to play at this pitch from the signs of usage on a particular left hand piece of his flute.

Traverso's clearly were made to play best at a certain pitch. To play slightly lower the left hand piece could be pulled out a little bit, say up to two or three mm. However it was much better even for that amount to have a different middle piece. This was quite common. I do not believe that these different middle pieces were aimed at bridging large pitch gaps. Although up to six different middle pieces were not uncommon most of them were useless. Only two or thee middle pieces could be used by a normal player without offending the ears extravagantly.

The Beukers has three exchange pieces, optimal at 408 Hz and reasonable at 415 Hz. I have changed certain tuning characteristics to make the copies optimal at 415 Hz. But the 408 Hz still is better.

Middle pieces as far apart as half a tone cannot both work well in my opinion. So I will not make a traverso with a middle piece for 415 Hz and 440 Hz, or with a middle piece for 415 Hz and 392 Hz. I think that 408Hz and 415 or 392 Hz and 398 are reasonable, but even there I have chosen to recalculate the instrument completely from 398 to 392 to have it optimal.

More in general one might say that a standard at 392 Hz or 415 Hz is not completely strange because good originals exist at those pitches. However it is my impression that we would have better been served with standards at 400 and 408 because many instruments have the best middle piece at those pitches. I realise full well that, without corroborating evidence this is not a very scientific statement and maybe I will collect this at some point in the future.

The bible on the subject of pitch is the Ph. D. Thesis of Bruce Haynes [1].

[1] Bruce Haynes, Pitch standards in the Baroque and Classical periods. Available from UMI services http://www.umi.com ISBN 0-612-08519-08

[2] J.G.Tromlitz, Ausfuehrlicher und gruendlicher Unterricht die Floete zu spielen, Facsimile Frits Knuf Buren 1973, 1985

日本語

main page

general

flutes
Renaissanc
prices
clips
böm2baroq
history
philosophy
contact
care
exhibitions
reactions
F1AID

technical

 

Hz-cents
tuning
fingering
workshop
carrying
pitch
dynamics
woods
links
reboring
resistance
key pads
sweet spot
temperature
each note
Stuck
Cork

originals

Beukers
Haka
Kirst
Kirst 415
Naust F
Wijne 1
Wijne 2
Palanca
Tassi
Naust B
400 Hz
Dutch
Ehrenfeld

private

Family
cv